linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: Add msm tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:31:06 -0800
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>, 
	Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, 
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: Add msm tests

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 6:13 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:58 PM Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/8/2024 11:50 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > The msm tests should skip on non-msm hw, so I think it should be safe to
> > > enable everywhere.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> > >
> >
> > I do see that all these tests use igt_msm_dev_open() to make sure it
> > opens only the MSM card.
> >
> > But if igt_msm_dev_open() fails, I dont see a igt_require() on some of
> > the tests to skip them. So how will it safely skip on non-msm HW?
> >
> > Unless i am missing something here ....
>
> hmm, at the time I added the initial msm tests, and
> igt_msm_dev_open(), I verified that they skipped on intel.. but since
> then I'd switched from intel to sc8280xp device for primary dev
> device, so I'd need to re-test to remember how it works.  If these
> aren't skipping on !msm, it is a bug

I double checked, these tests skip in drm_open_driver() with "No known
gpu found for chipset flags 0x64 (msm)", so no problem to run them on
all CI runners.

BR,
-R


> BR,
> -R
>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > > index f82cd90372f4..eaeb751bb0ad 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > > @@ -2910,3 +2910,52 @@ kms_writeback@...teback-invalid-parameters
> > >   kms_writeback@...teback-fb-id
> > >   kms_writeback@...teback-check-output
> > >   prime_mmap_kms@...fer-sharing
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-sanitycheck-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-sanitycheck-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-madvise-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-madvise-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-oom-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-gpu-oom-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-sanitycheck-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-sanitycheck-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-madvise-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-madvise-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-oom-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-oom-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-32
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-oom-8
> > > +msm_shrink@...y-mmap-dmabuf-oom-32
> > > +msm_mapping@...g
> > > +msm_mapping@...fw
> > > +msm_mapping@...dow
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-10-bos
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-10-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-100-bos
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-100-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-250-bos
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-250-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-500-bos
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-500-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-1000-bos
> > > +msm_submitoverhead@...mitbench-1000-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > +msm_recovery@...gcheck
> > > +msm_recovery@...-fault
> > > +msm_recovery@...-fault-parallel
> > > +msm_recovery@...a-fault
> > > +msm_submit@...ty-submit
> > > +msm_submit@...alid-queue-submit
> > > +msm_submit@...alid-flags-submit
> > > +msm_submit@...alid-in-fence-submit
> > > +msm_submit@...alid-duplicate-bo-submit
> > > +msm_submit@...alid-cmd-idx-submit
> > > +msm_submit@...alid-cmd-type-submit
> > > +msm_submit@...id-submit