lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:51:39 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Matthias Yee <mgyee9@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: fix open parentheses alignment

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:30:17PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
> > index 36183f2a64c1..688c870d89bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
> > @@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ static void vt6655_mac_set_bb_type(void __iomem *iobase, u32 mask)
> >   * Return Value: none
> >   */
> >  static void calculate_ofdmr_parameter(unsigned char rate,
> > -				       u8 bb_type,
> > -				       unsigned char *tx_rate,
> > -				       unsigned char *rsv_time)
> > +				      u8 bb_type,
> > +				      unsigned char *tx_rate,
> > +				      unsigned char *rsv_time)
> >  {
> >  	switch (rate) {
> >  	case RATE_6M:
> 
> Is there any chance that checkpatch is wrong about this warning?
> 
> I much prefer the alignment as it was before this patch: following lines
> are aligned with the first parameter after the '('.
> 

It just looks weird in the diff because of the + character at the front
and how the tabs work out.  It looks ok in the code.

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ