linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] arm64: Support Neoverse-V2 for Perf Arm SPE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dfe99d03-2d44-28c5-0125-b18993de9fa9@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:12:07 +0000
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>, acme@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
 treding@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
 will@...nel.org, john.g.garry@...cle.com, mike.leach@...aro.org,
 peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
 alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
 irogers@...gle.com, alisaidi@...zon.com, vsethi@...dia.com,
 rwiley@...dia.com, ywan@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] arm64: Support Neoverse-V2 for Perf Arm SPE



On 09/01/2024 19:23, Besar Wicaksono wrote:
> This series support Neoverse-V2 CPU in Perf Arm SPE.
> The first patch adds the Neoverse-V2 part number in kernel header.
> The second patch syncs the kernel change to the tools header.
> The third patch adds Neoverse-V2 into perf's Neoverse SPE data source list.
> 
> Besar Wicaksono (3):
>   arm64: Add Neoverse-V2 part
>   tools headers arm64: Add Neoverse-V2 part
>   perf arm-spe: Add Neoverse-V2 to neoverse list
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h       | 2 ++
>  tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c              | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> base-commit: d988c9f511af71a3445b6a4f3a2c67208ff8e480

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>