[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZ6D+AylYTNDW9F9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 03:48:08 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for
PCS Layer
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:16:10AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > W=1 builds now warn if module is built without a MODULE_DESCRIPTION().
> > Add descriptions to the LynxI PCS MediaTek's SoC.
>
> Does pcs-lynx.c also have this issue? It can be built at a module.
Absolutely. I can see the warning in pcs-lynx and pcs-pts.
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/net/pcs/pcs_xpcs.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/net/pcs/pcs-lynx.o
Powered by blists - more mailing lists