linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42cf5ca70c940b3e68c8ad0e4bab6f14f87d4486.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:14:43 +0100
From: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Bjorn Helgaas
 <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Randy Dunlap
 <rdunlap@...radead.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, John Sanpe
 <sanpeqf@...il.com>,  Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>, Niklas
 Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
 Uladzislau Koshchanka <koshchanka@...il.com>,  "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)"
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Kees Cook
 <keescook@...omium.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven
 <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, "wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com>, Yury
 Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Thomas
 Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, 
 dakr@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code

On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 10:03 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 09:55 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > Second Resend. Would be cool if someone could tell me what I'll
> > have to
> > do so we can get this merged.
> 
> I don't even know who'd merge it, but um doesn't seem appropriate...

UM isn't a recipent, I'd guess it's some mail filter which might make
it appear that way :)
The lists I sent this to are
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org

Anyways, PCI is for sure who should merge this, since it's 100% about
PCI.

> > 
> > @Stable-Kernel:
> > You receive this patch series because its first patch fixes leaks
> > in
> > PCI.
> 
> Too early for that, stable just ignores stuff before it hits
> mainline.

I know, they're in CC because of the "Fixes: "

P.

> 
> johannes
>