linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2cedb42a9eca23c37f03938cbccbd8489d0130d7.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:22:00 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>, Bjorn Helgaas
 <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Randy Dunlap
 <rdunlap@...radead.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,  John Sanpe
 <sanpeqf@...il.com>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>, Niklas
 Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
 Uladzislau Koshchanka <koshchanka@...il.com>, "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)"
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Kees Cook
 <keescook@...omium.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven
 <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, "wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@...edance.com>, Yury
 Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Thomas
 Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
 dakr@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/5] Regather scattered PCI-Code

On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 10:14 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 10:03 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 09:55 +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > Second Resend. Would be cool if someone could tell me what I'll
> > > have to
> > > do so we can get this merged.
> > 
> > I don't even know who'd merge it, but um doesn't seem appropriate...
> 
> UM isn't a recipent, I'd guess it's some mail filter which might make
> it appear that way :)

Oh. I guess I thought I was CC'ed as UM maintainer :)

> The lists I sent this to are
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
> linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Anyways, PCI is for sure who should merge this, since it's 100% about
> PCI.

Sounds good :)

johannes