lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 19:29:50 +0530
From: Parshuram Sangle <parshuram.sangle@...el.com>
To: mtosatti@...hat.com,
	rafael@...nel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jaishankar.rajendran@...el.com,
	parshuram.sangle@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: do not shrink guest poll_limit_ns below grow_start

While adjusting guest halt poll limit, grow block starts at
guest_halt_poll_grow_start without taking intermediate values.
Similar behavior is expected while shrinking the value. This
avoids short interval values which are really not required.

VCPU1 trace (guest_halt_poll_shrink equals 2):

VCPU1 grow 10000
VCPU1 shrink 5000
VCPU1 shrink 2500
VCPU1 shrink 1250
VCPU1 shrink 625
VCPU1 shrink 312
VCPU1 shrink 156
VCPU1 shrink 78
VCPU1 shrink 39
VCPU1 shrink 19
VCPU1 shrink 9
VCPU1 shrink 4

Similar change is done in KVM halt poll flow with below patch:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20211006133021.271905-3-sashal@kernel.org/

Co-developed-by: Rajendran Jaishankar <jaishankar.rajendran@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajendran Jaishankar <jaishankar.rajendran@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Parshuram Sangle <parshuram.sangle@...el.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
index 1dff3a52917d..663b7f164d20 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
@@ -98,10 +98,15 @@ static void adjust_poll_limit(struct cpuidle_device *dev, u64 block_ns)
 		unsigned int shrink = guest_halt_poll_shrink;
 
 		val = dev->poll_limit_ns;
-		if (shrink == 0)
+		if (shrink == 0) {
 			val = 0;
-		else
+		} else {
 			val /= shrink;
+			/* Reset value to 0 if shrunk below grow_start */
+			if (val < guest_halt_poll_grow_start)
+				val = 0;
+		}
+
 		trace_guest_halt_poll_ns_shrink(val, dev->poll_limit_ns);
 		dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
 	}
-- 
2.17.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ