[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbvmrdBkeOK71KGg@tpad>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:45:01 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Parshuram Sangle <parshuram.sangle@...el.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaishankar.rajendran@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: do not shrink guest poll_limit_ns below
grow_start
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 07:29:50PM +0530, Parshuram Sangle wrote:
> While adjusting guest halt poll limit, grow block starts at
> guest_halt_poll_grow_start without taking intermediate values.
> Similar behavior is expected while shrinking the value. This
> avoids short interval values which are really not required.
>
> VCPU1 trace (guest_halt_poll_shrink equals 2):
>
> VCPU1 grow 10000
> VCPU1 shrink 5000
> VCPU1 shrink 2500
> VCPU1 shrink 1250
> VCPU1 shrink 625
> VCPU1 shrink 312
> VCPU1 shrink 156
> VCPU1 shrink 78
> VCPU1 shrink 39
> VCPU1 shrink 19
> VCPU1 shrink 9
> VCPU1 shrink 4
>
> Similar change is done in KVM halt poll flow with below patch:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20211006133021.271905-3-sashal@kernel.org/
>
> Co-developed-by: Rajendran Jaishankar <jaishankar.rajendran@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendran Jaishankar <jaishankar.rajendran@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Parshuram Sangle <parshuram.sangle@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> index 1dff3a52917d..663b7f164d20 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> @@ -98,10 +98,15 @@ static void adjust_poll_limit(struct cpuidle_device *dev, u64 block_ns)
> unsigned int shrink = guest_halt_poll_shrink;
>
> val = dev->poll_limit_ns;
> - if (shrink == 0)
> + if (shrink == 0) {
> val = 0;
> - else
> + } else {
> val /= shrink;
> + /* Reset value to 0 if shrunk below grow_start */
> + if (val < guest_halt_poll_grow_start)
> + val = 0;
> + }
> +
> trace_guest_halt_poll_ns_shrink(val, dev->poll_limit_ns);
> dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists