[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39b4a009-1883-4e66-b743-6b69f0846418@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:05:10 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] media: qcom: camss: Add sc8280xp support
On 11/01/2024 20:13, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/24 20:57, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> A minimal set of patches to switch on sc8280xp support in CAMSS
>> upstream. Most of the SoC dependencies are either merged - CAMCC or very
>> close to being merged - CAMSS/CCI dtsi.
>>
>> Alot of prior work means we have far less interventions to make in this
>> driver to support this new SoC.
>>
>> Most of this series is already reviewed however it is gated on merge of
>> the CAMSS compat string here =>
>>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240111-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v4-2-cdd5c57ff1dc@linaro.org/
>> Link:
>> https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/linux-next-24-01-09-sc8280xp-camss-changes
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> ---
> What happened to the "vN" in the subject and the changelog?
>
> Konrad
Hmm it "felt" like a new series
Checking though - yep this should be v5
https://lwn.net/Articles/950887/
I'll resend
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists