linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: qcom: camss: Add sc8280xp resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <efadbf5d-bec9-4127-8928-ea0def4326fc@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:42:18 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: qcom: camss: Add sc8280xp resources



On 1/11/24 20:57, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> This commit describes the hardware layout for the sc8280xp for the
> following hardware blocks:
> 
> - 4 x VFE, 4 RDI per VFE
> - 4 x VFE Lite, 4 RDI per VFE
> - 4 x CSID
> - 4 x CSID Lite
> - 4 x CSI PHY
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> 
> ---

[...]

> +static const struct camss_subdev_resources csiphy_res_sc8280xp[] = {
> +	/* CSIPHY0 */

Are there any cases where a platform has PHYs with different
capabilities? Might be another nice thing to clean up in the
future..

[...]

> +
> +static const struct camss_subdev_resources vfe_res_sc8280xp[] = {
> +	/* IFE0 */
> +	{
> +		.regulators = {},
> +		.clock = { "gcc_axi_hf", "gcc_axi_sf", "cpas_ahb", "camnoc_axi", "vfe0", "vfe0_axi" },

VFE->IFE?

> +		.clock_rate = { { 0 },
> +				{ 0 },
> +				{ 19200000, 80000000},

Missing space

Also, the source of this clock has shared_ops, which means it's
parked to XO on disable.. Is the first frequency here useful?

> +				{ 19200000, 150000000, 266666667, 320000000, 400000000, 480000000 },

Similar story here

> +				{ 400000000, 558000000, 637000000, 760000000 },

And you (perhaps correctly) omitted 19.2MHz here

Same story for all other IFE/_LITEs in this patch

> +
> +static const struct resources_icc icc_res_sc8280xp[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "cam_ahb",
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.avg = 150000,
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.peak = 300000,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "cam_hf_mnoc",
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.avg = 2097152,
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.peak = 2097152,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "cam_sf_mnoc",
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.avg = 2097152,
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.peak = 2097152,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "cam_sf_icp_mnoc",
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.avg = 2097152,
> +		.icc_bw_tbl.peak = 2097152,

Mbps_to_icc()?


>   static const struct of_device_id camss_dt_match[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8916-camss", .data = &msm8916_resources },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-camss", .data = &msm8996_resources },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm660-camss", .data = &sdm660_resources },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-camss", .data = &sdm845_resources },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-camss", .data = &sm8250_resources },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-camss", .data = &sc8280xp_resources },
"sc" < "sd"

Konrad