[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bk9qjwvw.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:15:47 -0300
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Begunkov
<asml.silence@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] io_uring: Delete a redundant kfree() call in
io_ring_ctx_alloc()
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> writes:
> On 1/12/24 7:25 AM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> writes:
>>
>>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>>> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:54:43 +0100
>>>
>>> Another useful pointer was not reassigned to the data structure member
>>> ?io_bl? by this function implementation.
>>> Thus omit a redundant call of the function ?kfree? at the end.
>
> This is just nonsense...
>
> On top of that, this patch is pointless, and the 2nd patch is even worse
> in that it just makes a mess of cleanup. And for what reasoning?
> Absolutely none.
Ah, The description is non-sense, but the change in this patch seemed
correct to me, even if pointless, which is why I reviewed it. patch 2
is just garbage.
> There's a reason why I filter emails from this particular author
> straight to the trash, there's a long history of this kind of thing and
> not understanding feedback.
Clearly there is background with this author that I wasn't aware, and
just based on his responses, I can see your point. So I apologize for
giving him space to continue the spamming. My bad.
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists