[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d702f384-7c0f-443b-84bc-4333933cee7b@solid-run.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:17:19 +0000
From: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Nishanth Menon
<nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo
<kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@...id-run.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: rtc: abx80x: convert to yaml
Am 15.01.24 um 08:29 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 14/01/2024 17:26, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>>>> +maintainers: []
>>>> You need a name here. If there is no driver maintainer or anyone
>>>> interested, put devicetree list.
>>> Ack.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>> + - $ref: rtc.yaml#
>> + $ref: /schemas/interrupts.yaml#
>>
>> Is it acceptable to reference generic interrupts schema?:
> Why? No.
>
>> I see no rtc yaml doing that, and only some describe interrupts property explicitly. But Importing the schema would also cover -parent and -names.
> No, it wouldn't. It does not matter. I don't understand what are you
> trying to solve.
dtbs_check is complaining about interrupt-parent property,
because I added both interrrupts and interrupt-parent to my rtc node.
Also wondering whether interrupts property should be included in
the example.
I found this idea in yaml files outside rtc.
But no existing rtc yaml references that schema, so I asked.
sincerely
Josua Mayer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists