linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: rtc: abx80x: convert to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bb912aeb-15ad-4410-a1c4-3d895d81d30b@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:20:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@...id-run.com>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: rtc: abx80x: convert to yaml

On 15/01/2024 11:17, Josua Mayer wrote:
> Am 15.01.24 um 08:29 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> 
>> On 14/01/2024 17:26, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>>>>> +maintainers: []
>>>>> You need a name here. If there is no driver maintainer or anyone
>>>>> interested, put devicetree list.
>>>> Ack.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>>> +  - $ref: rtc.yaml#
>>> + $ref: /schemas/interrupts.yaml#
>>>
>>> Is it acceptable to reference generic interrupts schema?:
>> Why? No.
>>
>>> I see no rtc yaml doing that, and only some describe interrupts property explicitly. But Importing the schema would also cover -parent and -names.
>> No, it wouldn't. It does not matter. I don't understand what are you
>> trying to solve.
> dtbs_check is complaining about interrupt-parent property,
> because I added both interrrupts and interrupt-parent to my rtc node.

Difficult to say. You did not include example in your schema which
prevents parts of tests.

> 
> Also wondering whether interrupts property should be included in
> the example.

Yes, your example should be complete... but there is no example in the
first place :/



Best regards,
Krzysztof