linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Remove pattern match of ETE node name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f74650fd-195f-4b93-a7e0-23b316dd74ad@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:49:30 +0800
From: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose
	<suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark
	<james.clark@....com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin
	<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
        Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
        Tao Zhang
	<quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Remove pattern match
 of ETE node name



On 1/17/2024 3:40 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/01/2024 03:14, Jinlong Mao wrote:
>>>>          - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension
>>>> @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples:
>>>>    # An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections
>>>>      - |
>>>> -    ete0 {
>>>> +    ete-0 {
>>>
>>> Why do we need the number ? why not simply "ete" as Krzysztof suggested ?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Suzuki & Krzysztof ,
>>
>> If name all the ete nodes' name as 'ete', there will be error below when
>> build images.
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:301.6-312.4: ERROR
> 
> Why are you pasting DTSI for binding? How is it related? Do we talk
> about DTSI here? No, this is a binding patch.
> 

Hi Krzysztof,

Do you mean the name in DTSI can be different from the name in binding ?

Thanks
Jinlong Mao

>