[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff85db67-bd18-48fb-9050-81d731e5f402@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:40:08 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Mike Leach
<mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Remove pattern match
of ETE node name
On 17/01/2024 03:14, Jinlong Mao wrote:
>>> - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension
>>> @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples:
>>> # An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections
>>> - |
>>> - ete0 {
>>> + ete-0 {
>>
>> Why do we need the number ? why not simply "ete" as Krzysztof suggested ?
>>
>
> Hi Suzuki & Krzysztof ,
>
> If name all the ete nodes' name as 'ete', there will be error below when
> build images.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:301.6-312.4: ERROR
Why are you pasting DTSI for binding? How is it related? Do we talk
about DTSI here? No, this is a binding patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists