[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zafm-hkCI4sbOr78@fedora>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:40:58 -0500
From: Audra Mitchell <audra@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
hirokazu.yamauchi.hk@...achi.com, ddouwsma@...hat.com,
loberman@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com, rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:31:45AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:08:22PM -0500, Audra Mitchell wrote:
> > Currently we limit the size of the workqueue name to 24 characters due to
> > commit ecf6881ff349 ("workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len")
> > Increase the size to 32 characters and print a warning in the event
> > the requested name is larger than the limit of 32 characters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Audra Mitchell <audra@...hat.com>
>
> Applied to wq/for-6.9.
>
> Thanks.
Hey Tejun (and all others)
Thank you for the response. May I humbly mention that I did find the following
while testing my patch:
[ 0.120298] workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN (32 chars). Truncating to: events_freezable_power_efficien
In an effort to be thorough, would you like me to submit a patch shortening
this? Perhaps to "events_freezable_pwr_efficient"?
To be clear, I am not pushing the change, however, I do want to make sure that
the changes being submitted are not causing additional clutter.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists