linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZagJrod33CPFaXGg@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:09:02 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Audra Mitchell <audra@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
	hirokazu.yamauchi.hk@...achi.com, ddouwsma@...hat.com,
	loberman@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com, rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length

Hello,

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:40:58AM -0500, Audra Mitchell wrote:
> Thank you for the response. May I humbly mention that I did find the following
> while testing my patch:
> 
> [    0.120298] workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN (32 chars). Truncating to: events_freezable_power_efficien
> 
> In an effort to be thorough, would you like me to submit a patch shortening
> this? Perhaps to "events_freezable_pwr_efficient"?
> 
> To be clear, I am not pushing the change, however, I do want to make sure that
> the changes being submitted are not causing additional clutter. 

Oh yeah, please go ahead.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun