linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add RDP441 board device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 23:16:55 +0800
From: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Luo Jie
	<quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com>, <quic_suruchia@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_soni@...cinc.com>, <quic_pavir@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_souravp@...cinc.com>, <quic_linchen@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add RDP441 board device
 tree



On 1/10/2024 7:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/01/2024 12:20, Luo Jie wrote:
>> From: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
>>
>> RDP441 board has onboard QCA8386 switch and 10G SFP port.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts
>> index 846413817e9a..d51968e9d601 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts
>> @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
>>   / {
>>   	model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ5332 MI01.2";
>>   	compatible = "qcom,ipq5332-ap-mi01.2", "qcom,ipq5332";
>> +
>> +	soc@0 {
> 
> Nope, DTS does not define soc nodes.
>
OK, I will remove the soc node in the DTS file. SFP node should not be 
inside the soc node.

>> +		sfp1: sfp-1 {
> 
> Why is this soc? Where is the MMIO address?

Sure, SoC node should not be required. I will remove the soc node.

> 
>> +			compatible = "sff,sfp";
>> +			i2c-bus = <&blsp1_i2c1>;
>> +			los-gpios = <&tlmm 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +			tx-disable-gpios = <&tlmm 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>>   };
>>   
>>   &blsp1_i2c1 {
>> @@ -63,3 +72,45 @@ data-pins {
>>   		};
>>   	};
>>   };
>> +
>> +&qcom_ppe {
>> +	qcom,port_phyinfo {
> 
> Eh... We talk now about basics: please don't post downstream code, but
> first clean it up from all the junk. All the basic issues which you have
> in downstream and which we do not accept upstream.
> 
> I do not believe that this code passed internal review.
> 
> NAK.

Sure, got it. I will follow the upstream principles to use generic node 
name.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>