lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62428d47-20eb-4d02-886d-355d704de938@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 23:12:09 +0800
From: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Luo Jie
	<quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com>, <quic_suruchia@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_soni@...cinc.com>, <quic_pavir@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_souravp@...cinc.com>, <quic_linchen@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add RDP433 board device
 tree



On 1/12/2024 11:05 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 10 January 2024 13:20:59 EET, Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com> wrote:
>> From: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
>>
>> RDP433 board has four QCA8075 PHYs and two Aquantia 10G PHY onboard.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dts | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dts
>> index 1bb8d96c9a82..298c0853b4d2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dts
>> @@ -60,3 +60,69 @@ rclk-pins {
>> 		};
>> 	};
>> };
>> +
>> +&qcom_ppe {
>> +	qcom,port_phyinfo {
>> +		ppe_port0: port@0 {
>> +			port_id = <1>;
>> +			phy-mode = "qsgmii";
>> +			phy-handle = <&phy0>;
>> +		};
>> +		ppe_port1: port@1 {
>> +			port_id = <2>;
>> +			phy-mode = "qsgmii";
>> +			phy-handle = <&phy1>;
>> +		};
>> +		ppe_port2: port@2 {
>> +			port_id = <3>;
>> +			phy-mode = "qsgmii";
>> +			phy-handle = <&phy2>;
>> +		};
>> +		ppe_port3: port@3 {
>> +			port_id = <4>;
>> +			phy-mode = "qsgmii";
>> +			phy-handle = <&phy3>;
>> +		};
>> +		ppe_port4: port@4 {
>> +			port_id = <5>;
>> +			phy-mode = "usxgmii";
>> +			phy-handle = <&phy4>;
>> +		};
>> +		ppe_port5: port@5 {
>> +			port_id = <6>;
>> +			phy-mode = "usxgmii";
>> +			phy-handle = <&phy5>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mdio {
>> +	reset-gpios = <&tlmm 60 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +
>> +	phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
>> +		      reg = <16>;
>> +	      };
> 
> This part looks extremely wrong to me. If the reg is 16, then it should be @16 as well. You should have got a warning here.
> 
Sure, I will fix and update it. Thanks.

>> +
>> +	phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
>> +		      reg = <17>;
>> +	      };
>> +
>> +	phy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
>> +		      reg = <18>;
>> +	      };
>> +
>> +	phy3: ethernet-phy@3 {
>> +		      reg = <19>;
>> +	      };
>> +
>> +	phy4: ethernet-phy@4 {
>> +		      compatible ="ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45";
>> +		      reg = <8>;
>> +	      };
>> +
>> +	phy5: ethernet-phy@5 {
>> +		      compatible ="ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45";
>> +		      reg = <0>;
>> +	      };
>> +};
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ