[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf6440c08b8b7382e6693e18cdd29325aaea9cc9.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:12:47 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy
Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Haojian
Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Aaro
Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Vinod
Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Tom
Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
theo.lebrun@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, u-kumar1@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] phy: cadence-torrent: add suspend and resume
support
Hi Thomas,
On Mo, 2024-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Thomas Richard wrote:
> Add suspend and resume support.
> The alread_configured flag is cleared during suspend stage to force the
> phy initialization during the resume stage.
>
> Based on the work of Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/cadence/phy-cadence-torrent.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/cadence/phy-cadence-torrent.c b/drivers/phy/cadence/phy-cadence-torrent.c
> index 70413fca5776..31b2594e5942 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/cadence/phy-cadence-torrent.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/cadence/phy-cadence-torrent.c
> @@ -3006,6 +3006,62 @@ static void cdns_torrent_phy_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
[...]
> +static int cdns_torrent_phy_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct cdns_torrent_phy *cdns_phy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int node = cdns_phy->nsubnodes;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ret = cdns_torrent_clk(cdns_phy);
> + if (ret)
> + goto clk_cleanup;
> +
> + /* Enable APB */
> + reset_control_deassert(cdns_phy->apb_rst);
> +
> + if (cdns_phy->nsubnodes > 1) {
> + ret = cdns_torrent_phy_configure_multilink(cdns_phy);
> + if (ret)
> + goto put_lnk_rst;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +put_lnk_rst:
> + for (i = 0; i < node; i++)
> + reset_control_put(cdns_phy->phys[i].lnk_rst);
What is this intended to do? I expect this to explode in _remove, where
the lnk_rst are put again. Should this be:
reset_control_assert(cdns_phy->phys[i].lnk_rst);
?
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists