linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/18] tty: serial: samsung: make max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:27:31 -0600
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, 
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, 
	peter.griffin@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] tty: serial: samsung: make max_count unsigned int

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:54 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aroorg> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/17/24 15:38, André Draszik wrote:
> >>>> +       unsigned int max_count = port->fifosize;
> >>> What if port->fifosize is 0? Then this code below:
> >>>
> >>>     while (max_count-- > 0) {
> >>>
> >>> would cause int overflow, if max_count is unsigned?
> >>>
> >> good catch, Sam!
> > Does it matter, though? As this is a post-decrement, the test is done first, and the
> > decrement after. Therefore, it'll still bail out as expected.
>
> Indeed, it doesn't. This reminds me of stop replying to emails at the
> end of the day :)
>

And it reminds me to drink some coffee in the morning before doing any
reviews :) With above condition sorted, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>

> Cheers Andre'!
> ta