linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: micrel: Fix set/get PHC time for lan8814

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:00:09 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	richardcochran@...il.com, Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com,
	maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: micrel: Fix set/get PHC time for lan8814

> > Maybe submit this for net-next?
> 
> Anyway, I don't have strong feelings about this, if it goes to net or
> net-next, I just want to fix this at some point :)

Please submit to net-next. I think the ML bot which picks out patches
to backport is likely to see the work Fix in the subject and decided
to backport it anyway. But its not our problem if the bot breaks the
stable rules.

Is there any danger of regressions? Could the higher word actually
have a value for some reason today, which is being ignored. Would this
change then jump the time forward?

       Andrew