linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: correct gcc_gmac0_sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b616c6aa-9241-4eb0-a9cc-a7bc2e706d72@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 17:28:32 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>
Cc: mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
	richardcochran@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
	matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: correct gcc_gmac0_sys_clk reg

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:42:33PM +0800, Ziyang Huang wrote:

This, and all your patches need a Commit message.

What is the effect of this typo? What is broken because of it? Should
this be backported to stable? Does it need a Fixed: tag?

> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>


    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr