[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Za7QOLQEOcUTfhSX@x1-carbon>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:29:44 +0100
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug in
dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:19:52PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "msg_addr" variable is u64. However, the "aligned_offset" is an
> unsigned int. This means that when the code does:
>
> msg_addr &= ~aligned_offset;
>
> it will unintentionally zero out the high 32 bits. Use ALIGN_DOWN()
> to do the alignment instead.
>
> Fixes: 2217fffcd63f ("PCI: dwc: endpoint: Fix dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() alignment support")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> v2: fix typo in commit message
> v3: Use ALIGN_DOWN() instead of ANDing with ~aligned_offset (this is a
> style improvement).
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 5befed2dc02b..51679c6702cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> }
>
> aligned_offset = msg_addr & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
> - msg_addr &= ~aligned_offset;
> + msg_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);
> ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, 0, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr,
> epc->mem->window.page_size);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Oh.. I just got emails that the patch that this fixes has been backported,
so perhaps we should add:
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
as well...?
Kind regards,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists