[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <efebd848-c952-41f8-9422-fe2235d92259@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:50:56 +0100
From: "Janne Grunau" <j@...nau.net>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
"Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Martin PoviĊĦer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
Cc: asahi@...ts.linux.dev, "Hector Martin" <marcan@...can.st>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>,
"Asahi Lina" <lina@...hilina.net>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: apple: mark local functions static
Hej,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024, at 11:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> With linux-6.8, the kernel warns about functions that have no
> extern declaration, so mark both of these static.
>
> Fixes: 2d782b0d007d ("gpu: drm: apple: Add sound mode parsing")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> This is for the bits/200-dcp branch in https://github.com/AsahiLinux/linux,
> the code is not yet upstream.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/apple/parser.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/apple/parser.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/apple/parser.c
> index 44aad9a64f9a..ea9f40bb7de2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/apple/parser.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/apple/parser.c
> @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ int parse_epic_service_init(struct dcp_parse_ctx
> *handle, const char **name,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, unsigned int
> *ratebit)
> +static int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle,
> unsigned int *ratebit)
> {
> s64 rate;
> int ret = parse_int(handle, &rate);
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx
> *handle, unsigned int *ratebit)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int parse_sample_fmtbit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, u64 *fmtbit)
> +static int parse_sample_fmtbit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, u64 *fmtbit)
> {
> s64 sample_size;
> int ret = parse_int(handle, &sample_size);
thanks, patch included in my dev branch and will be in the next pull request I'll send to Hector.
I suppose the recipients are generated by an automated get_maintainers.pl invocation. Is that desired for out of tree drivers?
best regards,
Janne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists