linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: apple: mark local functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <3da403ff-365d-4cea-86f0-4009d1da6baa@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:34:04 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Janne Grunau" <j@...nau.net>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
 "Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
 Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
Cc: asahi@...ts.linux.dev, "Hector Martin" <marcan@...can.st>,
 "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>, "Asahi Lina" <lina@...hilina.net>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: apple: mark local functions static

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024, at 21:50, Janne Grunau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024, at 11:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> 
>> -int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, unsigned int 
>> *ratebit)
>> +static int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, 
>> unsigned int *ratebit)
>>  {
>>  	s64 rate;
>>  	int ret = parse_int(handle, &rate);
>> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx 
>> *handle, unsigned int *ratebit)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> 
>> -int parse_sample_fmtbit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, u64 *fmtbit)
>> +static int parse_sample_fmtbit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, u64 *fmtbit)
>>  {
>>  	s64 sample_size;
>>  	int ret = parse_int(handle, &sample_size);
>
> thanks, patch included in my dev branch and will be in the next pull 
> request I'll send to Hector.
>
> I suppose the recipients are generated by an automated 
> get_maintainers.pl invocation. Is that desired for out of tree drivers?

I was wondering about that as well, as I don't usually send
patches for code that isn't at least in linux-next yet.

I ended up using what is in the MAINTAINERS file for this driver
in the branch as that is is all I have at this point:

APPLE DRM DISPLAY DRIVER
M:      Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
L:      dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
S:      Maintained
T:      git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc
F:      drivers/gpu/drm/apple/

I left out the drivers/gpu/ maintainer addresses though. 

     Arnd