[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5cc939d-1f61-42d3-a5b8-9a1a0a5c2dff@tweaklogic.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:41:48 +1030
From: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Anshul Dalal <anshulusr@...il.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>,
Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: light: Squash APDS9300 and
APDS9960 schemas
On 22/1/24 01:57, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 15:47:32 +1030
> Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com> wrote:
>
>> Squashing Avago (Broadcom) APDS9300 and APDS9960 schemas into one
>> file and removing the other. This is done as per the below review:
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4e785d2e-d310-4592-a75a-13549938dcef@linaro.org/
>
> Sounds like a Suggested-by tag to reflect the ideas would be sensible here.
>
>>
>> This patch series adds the driver support and device tree binding schemas
>> for APDS9306 Ambient Light Sensor.
>
> This sentence isn't relevant to this patch, so I'd drop it.
> We don't need additional motivation.
>
>> It was pointed out in earlier reviews
>> that the schemas for APDS9300 and APDS9960 looks similar and should be
>> merged. This particular patch does the first operation of merging
>> APDS9300 and APDS9960 schema files.
> You have a reference above which is enough.
>
> "Merge very similar schemas for APDS9300 and APDS9960."
> is sufficient description alongside a suggested by tag and if you like
> a link tag to as above. Note however that Link is an official tag
> so belongs in the tag block at the end, not inline in the text.
>
>>
> Link: ...
Thank you so much Jonathan for taking time to explain these things.
Regards,
Subhajit Ghosh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists