linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda: Increase default bdl_pos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0b6f3998-135f-4059-a8a8-e924281353f8@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:05:11 +0100
From: Amadeusz Sławiński
 <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@...il.com>, tiwai@...e.com
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda: Increase default bdl_pos_adj for Apollo Lake

On 1/22/2024 10:23 AM, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Apollo Lake seems to also suffer from IRQ timing issues. After being up for ~4
> minutes, a Pentium N4200 system ends up falling back to workqueue-based IRQ
> handling:
> 
> [  208.019906] snd_hda_intel 0000:00:0e.0: IRQ timing workaround is activated
> for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
> 
> Unfortunately, the Baytrail and Braswell workaround value of 32 samples isn't
> enough to fix the issue here. Default to 64 samples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@...il.com>
> ---
>   sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> index 2276adc84478..9fb54813693c 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> @@ -1732,6 +1732,8 @@ static int default_bdl_pos_adj(struct azx *chip)
>   		case 0x0f04: /* Baytrail */
>   		case 0x2284: /* Braswell */
>   			return 32;
> +		case 0x5a98: /* Apollo Lake */
> +			return 64;
>   		}
>   	}
>   

And seems like I've missed some IDs, when doing PCI IDs conversion. 
Anyway, can you use PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_HDA_APL instead of 0x5a98 as it 
is self describing (no need for comment)?

And if you want more patches in kernel - convert first 0x0f04 & 0x2284 
to PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_HDA_BYT & PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_HDA_BSW and then do 
the above change ;)