[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b59067f0-fdba-40d1-bb52-9f66fd833f40@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:33:47 +0100
From: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Haojian Zhuang
<haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>, Andi Shyti
<andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Tom Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
theo.lebrun@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, u-kumar1@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: move suspend/resume to
suspend_noirq/resume_noirq
On 1/19/24 17:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM Thomas Richard
> <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>> On 1/15/24 21:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:16 PM Thomas Richard
>>> <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops pinctrl_single_pm_ops = {
>>>> + SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pinctrl_single_suspend_noirq,
>>>> + pinctrl_single_resume_noirq)
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Use proper / modern macro.
>>
>> fixed, use DEFINE_NOIRQ_DEV_PM_OPS now
>
> ...
>
>>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Why ifdeferry is needed (esp. taking into account pm_ptr() use below)?
>>
>> We may have an "unused variable" warning for pinctrl_single_pm_ops if
>> CONFIG_PM is undefined (due to pm_ptr).
>
> This is coupled with the above. Fixing above will automatically make
> the right thing.
Yes you're right.
By the way I can use pm_sleep_ptr instead of pm_ptr.
--
Thomas Richard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists