linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78e296fb-a3dc-4e00-94bc-91dab7294887@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:55:28 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
 "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "abelvesa@...nel.org" <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
 "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
 "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
 "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95

On 23/01/2024 14:08, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Conor, Krzysztof
> 
> I replied you both here.
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95
>>
>> On 21/01/2024 12:46, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>>
>>> Add i.MX95 clock dt-binding header file
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>
>> This should be squashed with respective binding patch.
> 
> i.MX95 use SCMI firmware, the SCP processor handles
> clock/power/pinmux/reset/performance and etc.
> 
> I just add the index that SCMI exports, and Linux/UBoot
> will use the index and go through SCMI to do real HW
> configuration.
> 
> In such case, should I still add HW information in
> a yaml binding doc? I am not sure what should be added
> if yes.

Then why do you need it in the binding? I don't see any use of this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof