linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <DU0PR04MB94173B34D426181D285B995088742@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:59:46 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
	<peng.fan@....nxp.com>, "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "abelvesa@...nel.org"
	<abelvesa@...nel.org>, "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>, "shawnguo@...nel.org"
	<shawnguo@...nel.org>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com"
	<festevam@...il.com>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, dl-linux-imx
	<linux-imx@....com>, "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95
> 
> On 23/01/2024 14:08, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Conor, Krzysztof
> >
> > I replied you both here.
> >
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: support NXP i.MX95
> >>
> >> On 21/01/2024 12:46, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> >>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >>>
> >>> Add i.MX95 clock dt-binding header file
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >>
> >> This should be squashed with respective binding patch.
> >
> > i.MX95 use SCMI firmware, the SCP processor handles
> > clock/power/pinmux/reset/performance and etc.
> >
> > I just add the index that SCMI exports, and Linux/UBoot will use the
> > index and go through SCMI to do real HW configuration.
> >
> > In such case, should I still add HW information in a yaml binding doc?
> > I am not sure what should be added if yes.
> 
> Then why do you need it in the binding? I don't see any use of this.

ok, should I just add the clk index header in same folder as soc dtsi?

Thanks,
Peng.


> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof