[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240123160405.360437-4-afd@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:04:05 -0600
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use index to get hwspinlock pointer
For loops with multiple initializers and increments are hard to read
and reason about, simplify this by using the looping index to index
into the hwspinlock array.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 1b0a1bea2b24a..a2555c41320d8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops omap_hwspinlock_ops = {
static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
- struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
void __iomem *io_base;
int num_locks, i, ret;
/* Only a single hwspinlock block device is supported */
@@ -117,8 +116,8 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!bank)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
- hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
+ for (i = 0; i < num_locks; i++)
+ bank->lock[i].priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
base_id, num_locks);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists