[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240123160405.360437-1-afd@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:04:02 -0600
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] hwspinlock: omap: Remove unneeded check for OF node
We do not use the OF node anymore, nor does it matter how
we got to probe, so remove the check for of_node.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index a9fd9ca45f2a8..cca55143d24d4 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops omap_hwspinlock_ops = {
static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
void __iomem *io_base;
@@ -82,9 +81,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Only a single hwspinlock block device is supported */
int base_id = 0;
- if (!node)
- return -ENODEV;
-
io_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(io_base))
return PTR_ERR(io_base);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists