[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05e23c85-1bae-48a5-b1d1-cb61e0b1efdf@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:45:15 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: remove full list manipulation for non-debug
slab
On 1/17/24 12:45, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> Since debug slab is processed by free_to_partial_list(), and only debug
> slab which has SLAB_STORE_USER flag would care about the full list, we
> can remove these unrelated full list manipulations from __slab_free().
Well spotted.
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 20c03555c97b..f0307e8b4cd2 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4187,7 +4187,6 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> * then add it.
> */
> if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s) && unlikely(!prior)) {
> - remove_full(s, n, slab);
> add_partial(n, slab, DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL);
> stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
> }
> @@ -4201,9 +4200,6 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> */
> remove_partial(n, slab);
> stat(s, FREE_REMOVE_PARTIAL);
> - } else {
> - /* Slab must be on the full list */
> - remove_full(s, n, slab);
> }
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists