linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory: fix folio_set_dirty() vs. folio_mark_dirty() in zap_pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0b88dbe8-e1e5-49c3-8e6f-4d80e8129477@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:57:13 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: "Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory: fix folio_set_dirty() vs.
 folio_mark_dirty() in zap_pte_range()

On 23.01.24 09:49, Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>
> 
> Without this fix, testing the latest exfat with xfstests, test cases generic/029
> and generic/030 will fail.

Great, thanks for testing and for providing actual reproducers!

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb