[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d5249a6-5838-4af1-be18-3b9a9e34a937@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:57:56 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
peter.griffin@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: andi.shyti@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
tomasz.figa@...il.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
andre.draszik@...aro.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: define USI8 with I2C
configuration
On 1/23/24 08:44, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> However I don't fully understand why that dependency - except patch hunk
>> context - exists. You shouldn't have such dependency.
>>
> Let me try offline, I'll get back to you.
The dropped patches depend on the dt-bindings patch that you queued
through the "next/drivers" branch:
b393a6c5e656 dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101-clock: add PERIC0 clock
management unit
We need the peric0 bindings that are referenced in device tree, that's
why the next/dt64 branch failed to build.
Please let me know if there's something on my side that I have to do
(now or in the future).
Thanks,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists