[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf651183-9321-4dd7-b8b4-4cd635760f31@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:59:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: andi.shyti@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
tomasz.figa@...il.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
andre.draszik@...aro.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: define USI8 with I2C
configuration
On 23/01/2024 09:57, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
>
> On 1/23/24 08:44, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>> However I don't fully understand why that dependency - except patch hunk
>>> context - exists. You shouldn't have such dependency.
>>>
>> Let me try offline, I'll get back to you.
>
> The dropped patches depend on the dt-bindings patch that you queued
> through the "next/drivers" branch:
>
> b393a6c5e656 dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101-clock: add PERIC0 clock
> management unit
>
> We need the peric0 bindings that are referenced in device tree, that's
> why the next/dt64 branch failed to build.
>
> Please let me know if there's something on my side that I have to do
> (now or in the future).
It is useful to mention this in cover letter, so I will know how to
apply the patches. I understand therefore the dependency mention in the
cover letter is not accurate, so I can ignore that aspect.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists