[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170605662743.1691877.1586103440745721732.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:38:40 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf sched: Fix task state report
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 02:08:55 -0500, Ze Gao wrote:
> No functional changes introduced in v2, just got v1 rebased onto
> the tip of perf-tools-next for a clean apply.
>
Applied to perf-tools-next except for the last refactoring one.
I'll test it separately.
Best regards,
--
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists