[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD8CoPBpkeSFcFv3Fs+0TkafmUY4x3NdtfqPfqei2f246xFYZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:08:30 +0800
From: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf sched: Fix task state report
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 8:38 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 02:08:55 -0500, Ze Gao wrote:
> > No functional changes introduced in v2, just got v1 rebased onto
> > the tip of perf-tools-next for a clean apply.
> >
>
> Applied to perf-tools-next except for the last refactoring one.
> I'll test it separately.
Awesome!
Thanks,
-- Ze
> Best regards,
> --
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists