linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: modify the wrong compatible name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88e8cffb-024d-4f4d-ba1f-e0be9ee85e31@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 07:38:31 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
 konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: modify the wrong
 compatible name

On 24/01/2024 03:33, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> Use right compatible name "qcom,sm4450-tlmm" instead of
> "qcom,sm4450-pinctrl".

Why do you claim this one is right and other is wrong? Provide
arguments. To me the compatible looks correct.

Best regards,
Krzysztof