[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqXS97FXoTwiLaSeHHEDOeBFRPRbCNR6WF-ArDm22tu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:07:55 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: modify the wrong
compatible name
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 08:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2024 03:33, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> > Use right compatible name "qcom,sm4450-tlmm" instead of
> > "qcom,sm4450-pinctrl".
>
> Why do you claim this one is right and other is wrong? Provide
> arguments. To me the compatible looks correct.
Yeah, but the driver (and the dtsi) use -tlmm
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists