[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b730cb5-871f-47b8-9abd-d8f39d3b8ec6@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:46:26 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: modify the wrong
compatible name
On 24/01/2024 09:07, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 08:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/01/2024 03:33, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>> Use right compatible name "qcom,sm4450-tlmm" instead of
>>> "qcom,sm4450-pinctrl".
>>
>> Why do you claim this one is right and other is wrong? Provide
>> arguments. To me the compatible looks correct.
>
> Yeah, but the driver (and the dtsi) use -tlmm
Are they merged? If so, it would be the argument for the commit msg.
Just provide some rationale why this is done this way, not the other
(fixing driver and DTS).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists