linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: Make PTP timestamp HWRM more silent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:44:44 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>, Michael Chan
 <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard
 Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, gospo@...adcom.com, "open list:BROADCOM
 BNXT_EN 50 GIGABIT ETHERNET DRIVER" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, open list
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: Make PTP timestamp HWRM more silent

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:51:25 +0530 Pavan Chebbi wrote:
> > > LGTM, however, you may still need to add a proper fixes tag.  
> >
> > Thanks. I didn't include a fix tag because it is not a fix per se, but,
> > I can easily send a v2 if this is needed.  

We should pick it as a fix. If we put it in net-next and someone
complains cherry-picking it into net would be a PITA. And we shouldn't
spew WARN()s about known-to-be-occurring conditions, GregKH is pretty
clear about that.

If you can post the Fixes tag in a reply our apply scripts should pick
it up automatically. Or at least mine will :)