[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f44d5c58-234d-45ec-8027-47df079e2f16@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:45:56 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: andi.shyti@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org,
peter.griffin@...aro.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/28] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: add
samsung,spi-fifosize property
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:30:53PM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> On 1/25/24 17:26, Mark Brown wrote:
> > OK, so just the compatible is enough information then?
> For gs101, yes. All the gs101 SPI instances are configured with 64 bytes
> FIFO depths. So instead of specifying the FIFO depth for each SPI node,
> we can infer the FIFO depth from the compatible.
But this is needed for other SoCs? This change is scattered through a
very large series which does multiple things so it's a bit difficult to
follow what's going on here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists