linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/cpa-test: Correct length selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4f5117e3-4dfb-4b37-9ff4-b5f156494d94@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:30:55 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/cpa-test: Correct length selection

On 1/25/24 10:24, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> The length of pages to modify corresponding to addr[i] is given in
> len[i].  Remove the hard coded 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@...il.com>
> ---
> This is a typo, right?  The other cases use len[i].

Sure looks like it to me.

Any idea how this could have gone unnoticed for 5 years?