linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/cpa-test: Correct length selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:39:51 -0500
From: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@...il.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org, 
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/cpa-test: Correct length selection

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 1:30 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/25/24 10:24, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > The length of pages to modify corresponding to addr[i] is given in
> > len[i].  Remove the hard coded 1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@...il.com>
> > ---
> > This is a typo, right?  The other cases use len[i].
>
> Sure looks like it to me.
>
> Any idea how this could have gone unnoticed for 5 years?

Not really, which is why I wondered if I was missing something.

Regards,
Jason