[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240125045852.urocd3yzts5ajmbh@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:28:52 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
"kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Don't error out if supply is not
found
On 24-01-24, 17:31, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> devm_regulator_get_optional() returns -ENODEV if no supply can be found.
> By introducing its usage, commit 788715b5f21c ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw:
> Wait for CPU supplies before probing") caused the driver to fail probe
> if no supply was present in any of the CPU DT nodes.
>
> Use devm_regulator_get() instead since the CPUs do require supplies
> even if not described in the DT. It will gracefully return a dummy
> regulator if none is found in the DT node, allowing probe to succeed.
>
> Fixes: 788715b5f21c ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probing")
> Reported-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org>
> Closes: https://linux.kernelci.org/test/case/id/65b0b169710edea22852a3fa/
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists