linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Don't error out if supply is not found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2452472f-72ab-4422-97a3-1fda7ca8c862@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:23:43 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
 <rafael@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Don't error out if supply is not
 found

Il 24/01/24 21:31, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> devm_regulator_get_optional() returns -ENODEV if no supply can be found.
> By introducing its usage, commit 788715b5f21c ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw:
> Wait for CPU supplies before probing") caused the driver to fail probe
> if no supply was present in any of the CPU DT nodes.
> 
> Use devm_regulator_get() instead since the CPUs do require supplies
> even if not described in the DT. It will gracefully return a dummy
> regulator if none is found in the DT node, allowing probe to succeed.
> 
> Fixes: 788715b5f21c ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Wait for CPU supplies before probing")
> Reported-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org>
> Closes: https://linux.kernelci.org/test/case/id/65b0b169710edea22852a3fa/
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>

> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
> index a1aa9385980a..8d097dcddda4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   			return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EPROBE_DEFER,
>   					     "Failed to get cpu%d device\n", cpu);
>   
> -		cpu_reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "cpu");
> +		cpu_reg = devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "cpu");
>   		if (IS_ERR(cpu_reg))
>   			return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(cpu_reg),
>   					     "CPU%d regulator get failed\n", cpu);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 9ac3ebaef3cc43ecd136911c44f1427286ee5a05
> change-id: 20240124-mtk-cpufreq-hw-regulator-enodev-fix-f614019689d0
> 
> Best regards,