[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76300deb-f532-4d74-a97a-4cd321ae8f41@moroto.mountain>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:11:15 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Cc: jikos@...nel.org, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, mail@...thek.com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: hidraw: fix a problem of memory leak in
hidraw_release()
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 02:32:26PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> 'struct hidraw_list' is a circular queue whose head can be smaller than
> tail. Using 'list->tail != list->head' to release all memory that should
> be released.
>
> Fixes: a5623a203cff ("HID: hidraw: fix memory leak in hidraw_release()")
> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
This is very clever. How did you find that? Was it through static
analysis or just review? Perhaps using syzkaller?
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
I imagine we could write a checker heuristic to identify ->tail and
->head struct members and then complain if they were ever used in a <
or > comparison.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists