[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8eb843fc0a3a40f1090283b3081e4c12846e82c3.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:10:15 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Chen Wang <unicornxw@...il.com>,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, chao.wei@...hgo.com, conor@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
haijiao.liu@...hgo.com, xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com, guoren@...nel.org,
jszhang@...nel.org, inochiama@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] reset: sophgo: add SG2042 reset generator driver
On Do, 2024-01-25 at 20:07 +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> On 2024/1/25 18:43, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > On Do, 2024-01-25 at 14:11 +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> > > From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
> > >
> > > Reuse reset-simple driver for the Sophgo SG2042 reset generator.
> > Subject prefix should be "reset: simple: "
> Ok.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/reset/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > drivers/reset/reset-simple.c | 2 ++
> > > drivers/reset/sophgo/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/reset/sophgo/Kconfig
> > >
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/sophgo/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/sophgo/Kconfig
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..9ad96e49e1dd
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/reset/sophgo/Kconfig
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > +
> > > +config RESET_SOPHGO_SG2042
> > > + bool "Sophgo SG2042 Reset Driver"
> > > + depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
> > > + select RESET_SIMPLE
> > > + default ARCH_SOPHGO
> > > + help
> > > + This enables the reset controller driver for the Sophgo SG2042 SoC.
> > > +
> > Drop the Kconfig, just add a default y if ARCH_SOPHGO to RESET_SIMPLE.
>
> hi,Philipp,
>
> The purpose of my adding Kconfig is to consider that other socs under
> sophgo may not use RESET_SIMPLE. I'm worried that the coverage is too
> large when default y if ARCH_SOPHGO? What do you think?
If ARCH_SOPHGO coverage is considered too wide, it's not correct to
make RESET_SOPHGO_SG2024 "default ARCH_SOPHGO" either, so there's no
significant difference.
The question is whether you need it at all. Can SG2042 boot, possibly
with reduced functionality, into a useful system without the reset
controller? If so, maybe it is enough to rely on a defconfig to enable
RESET_SIMPLE? Otherwise, reset-simple could be considered small enough
to accept carrying it around for non-SG2042 SoCs by default, it can be
disabled manually, after all.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists